QuilrAI
vsPrompt Security
QuilrAI vs Prompt Security
Prompt Security scans prompts for injection. QuilrAI governs the entire agent lifecycle, from discovery to skill-level permission binding to continuous red-teaming.
Prompt Security: Prompt firewall for LLM apps
Side by side
Feature comparison
| Feature | QuilrAI | Prompt Security |
|---|---|---|
| AI Agent Discovery (AI-SPM) | Yes | No |
| MCP Governance | Yes | No |
| Skill-Level Permissions | Yes | No |
| Red Team Agent (continuous) | Yes | No |
| Guardian Setup Wizard | Yes | No |
| Open Source AI (Ollama / vLLM) | Yes | Partial |
| Agentic Coding Coverage | Yes | Partial |
| Multi-Agent Delegation | Yes | No |
| Runtime <50ms Enforcement | Yes | Yes |
| AI-SPM Posture Management | Yes | No |
Choose QuilrAI when…
- You're governing agentic AI (Claude Code, Cursor, MCP servers) not just prompts
- You need a full audit trail for SOC 2 / HIPAA
- Your engineering team uses open source models you need to govern
Choose Prompt Security when…
- You only need prompt content scanning with no agent governance
- Pure API-call policy filtering is sufficient for your use case
Verdict
Prompt Security focuses narrowly on prompt content. QuilrAI governs the full agent, what it can do, what it can access, and whether that changes over time.